The Grant Project
Saved
Grant Readiness Worksheet Series
Worksheet No. 06

Partnership
Planner

A letter of support is a sentence. A partnership is a commitment.

01Why This Matters

Funders look for evidence that the work is supported by more than just you.

Real partnerships signal three things at once: that the work has community buy-in, that you have capacity beyond your own walls, and that someone besides you is accountable for the outcomes. All three matter to reviewers.

Letters of support are common. Substantive partnerships are rare and powerful. The difference shows up in your application and in how the work actually gets delivered.

Build the partnerships before you need them. The strongest letters of support come from people you already work with.

Partnership infrastructure is a year-round investment. Organizations that wait for a NOFO to ask for letters of support end up with form-letter endorsements that signal exactly that to reviewers.

02The Concept in Plain Language

Three tiers of partnership. Funders can tell the difference.

Collaborators share real work. They have specific roles, accountability for outcomes, and often share funding through a subaward or contract. Documented in MOUs or subrecipient agreements.

Partners share resources or outcomes without necessarily sharing funds. They contribute staff time, data access, facility use, or referral pipelines. Documented in MOUs or partnership agreements.

Letters of support are endorsements. They signal community alignment but do not commit resources or accountability. Useful, but not a substitute for the first two tiers.

Strong applications include all three. Federal reviewers in particular are trained to spot the difference between substantive partnerships and goodwill endorsements.

03What Grant-Ready Looks Like
The Standard

A grant-ready organization maintains a current list of collaborators, partners, and letter-of-support relationships, with documented agreements at the top two tiers.

Grant-ready also means having templates ready: a partnership MOU template, a subrecipient agreement template, and a letter-of-support request template that partners can use without rewriting from scratch.

04Your Worksheet

Map your current and potential partners. Identify which tier each belongs in.

Be honest about the difference between someone who would write a letter and someone who would do the work. Your work autosaves as you go.

MOU, subrecipient agreement, contract. Name them.
Documented in MOUs or partnership agreements ideally.
Elected officials, community organizations, faith-based groups, business leaders. List names.
What gap would they fill? What would you offer in return?
Where would a real partnership strengthen the work and the application?
Draft language that makes it easy for partners to respond quickly.
05What This Looks Like in Practice

Notice how each example distinguishes between collaborators, partners, and letter writers.

Nonprofit

A regional food bank applying for a USDA grant has three documented collaborators (community-based distribution organizations operating under subrecipient agreements), two partners (a logistics company providing reduced-cost transportation and a university providing evaluation support), and twelve letter-of-support relationships across elected officials, faith communities, and peer nonprofits.

Their partner ecosystem has been built over four years. Letters of support are tailored, not generic, and arrive within a week of being requested.

"Our application is supported by three subrecipient collaborators delivering distribution in target counties, two partners providing logistics and evaluation capacity, and twelve letters of support from community, civic, and faith leaders representing every county in the service area."
Local Government

A county applying for a federal economic development grant has two collaborators (neighboring counties operating under interlocal agreements for shared workforce services), three partners (a regional MPO, the state Department of Commerce, and a community college providing curriculum), and letters of support from the chamber of commerce, school district, and the state economic development authority.

The interlocal agreements predate the application by two years, signaling sustained regional commitment rather than NOFO-driven coordination.

"This project is supported by two collaborating counties under existing interlocal agreements, three partners contributing planning, policy, and curriculum capacity, and letters of support from regional and state economic development institutions."
06Red Flags

Pause and reassess if any of these are true.

Partnership weakness is one of the most fixable readiness gaps, but only if you start early.

Watch for these signals
  • All of your partners are verbal commitments with nothing in writing.
  • You are asking for letters of support after the NOFO has already been released.
  • Your partners describe the project differently than you do when asked.
  • You have no plan to expand or refresh your partnership base.
  • Every partner is from the same sector or geography, with no diversity in your coalition.
Your Next Step

Confirm what you have. Build what you need.

If your partnerships are strong: confirm current commitments in writing and refresh letters of support if they are more than a year old.

If your partnerships are thin: start the relationship-building work now. Identify the three highest-value partners you are missing and begin those conversations before the next NOFO drops.

Continue to Worksheet 07: Budget Builder to translate your project into the financial story reviewers need to see.

For ongoing strategy, frameworks, and grant insights, explore The Grant Project Library.

thegrantproject.com
The Complete Series

Want all 10 worksheets in one place?

Access the full Grant Readiness Worksheet Series, plus four Financial Foundations resources for going deeper.

Access the Series
© 2026 The Grant Project · Worksheet 06 · Partnership Planner
Hard work doesn't win grants. Readiness does.