Your budget tells your project's story in numbers. Make sure the two stories match.
A reviewer will check whether the activities you describe in the narrative match the costs in the budget. Mismatches signal poor financial planning at best and inflated estimates at worst.
Federal awards are governed by 2 CFR 200, which sets hard rules on what costs are allowable, how indirect costs are calculated, and how funds may be used. Many private funders apply similar standards. Knowing the rules is part of grant readiness.
Strong budgets are not just compliant. They are credible. Every line item answers what it is, how it was calculated, and why it is necessary for the project.
Direct costs are tied specifically to the project: personnel time on the project, materials used by the project, travel for the project. They are charged to the award.
Indirect costs support the project and the rest of your organization: facilities, executive leadership, accounting, IT. They are recovered through an indirect cost rate.
Allowable costs meet the four-part test under 2 CFR 200: necessary and reasonable, allocable to the award, consistent with organizational policies, and conforming to award terms.
Unallowable costs cannot be charged to federal awards. The common ones: alcohol, entertainment, lobbying, fundraising, bad debts, fines and penalties.
Your indirect cost rate authority matters. If you have a Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (NICRA) with your cognizant federal agency, you use that rate. If you do not, you can elect the de minimis rate of 15 percent of MTDC (Modified Total Direct Costs). Either way, document the authority in your budget narrative.
A grant-ready organization can produce a budget that matches the funder's required format, aligns line-by-line with the project narrative, and documents the basis for every calculation.
Grant-ready also means knowing your indirect cost rate authority, segregating unallowable costs in your general ledger, and being able to explain the budget to a reviewer or auditor without scrambling.
Start with five core categories. Add detail as needed. Confirm every line maps to your project narrative. Your work autosaves as you go.
A workforce development nonprofit's 187,500 dollar budget for a one-year Department of Labor project: Personnel 120,000 (Director 0.25 FTE, Trainer 1.0 FTE, calculated at organizational salary scales), fringe 30,000 (calculated at organization's audited 25 percent rate), travel 8,000 (four conferences at 2,000 each, per GSA rates), supplies 5,000 (training materials per cohort, calculated from prior program data), indirect 24,500 (de minimis at 15 percent of MTDC).
Every line item is referenced in the project narrative. The de minimis rate is elected because the organization has no NICRA.
A city public works department's 900,000 dollar federal infrastructure grant budget: Construction 800,000 (scoped per the engineer's estimate and project narrative), engineering and design 75,000 (calculated at 9.4 percent of construction, consistent with state procurement standards), inspection 25,000 (calculated at 3.1 percent of construction). Contingency is not included because the NOFO does not allow it. No indirect costs are charged to the award.
Every line item maps to a phase in the project narrative. The decision to not charge indirect costs is documented in the budget justification.
Budget gaps are usually the easiest readiness gaps to close. Take the time before you submit.
Access the full Grant Readiness Worksheet Series, plus four Financial Foundations resources for going deeper.
Access the Series